Syriza v Mitsotakis for Bratakos – Papastavrou: And this crisis touches the Maximus Mansion directly

Boomeragh consider that his insistence on attempting to link the main opposition party and PASOK to the country’s economic and business interests has returned to the Government. At the same time they point out that the fact that Kyriakos Mitsotakis was forced out of government by two of his closest associates – because they went to the house of a well-known businessman to wish him for his roll-call holiday while the government has targeted him considering that he is making moves against her – shows that this crisis is also directly touching the Maximos Mansion. They even say that they come after the removal of Prime Minister Gregory Gregory Gregory’s nephew on the subject of wiretaps from Maximos Palace. This fact, said SYRIZA executives, shows that “something crooked exists in the Maximos Mansion which is occasionally revealed through a series of bad manipulations.” “His late battle against interests unfortunately reminds his father, who in his fall decided to denounce the “intertwined interests”. The “I will not co-rule with any paracentre” of Kyriakos Mitsotakis is the briefest joke of the post-politization. We all know each other in this place. Here we know well what he knows, the SYRIZA executives report. At the same time, they point out that Kyriakos Mitsotakis resorted to unacceptable characterizations against the president of SYRIZA by characterising the faidros and speaking ironically about Stefanos Kasselakis’s term of office by talking about a tiresome term. They even pointed out that it is unacceptable for the prime minister to discredit a law of the state and for everyone who makes use of this provision. They also said that Stefanos Kasselakis with his posts actually put the government in a particularly difficult position as he highlighted the issue that brought the resignations of the two ministers. In his first post, the president of SYRIZA had challenged the Prime Minister to respond “if he dares what work his two closest associates (Papastavros-Bratakos) had done on Sunday night in the home of the businessman who accuses them of “economic interests that they want to throw at us”? Is the Mitsotakis line the ND to blame the “snut” and the Maximus to meet with him? A few hours later the leader of the main opposition came back saying: ‘Mr. Prime Minister, I rephrase the first question from what I told you (see, we do not anticipate the rhythms of decay). Why did you send away your two closest associates after their visit “in the interests that undermine us” last Sunday? Did the drinks have anything? Weren’t the cigars good? Or did the mission not work? Did you or did you not talk to them from Canada to find out how the meeting went? Did they give you the wrong report? Mr. Mitsotakis, you run an organization in disbandment. I return my proposal for a decent departure, before the parastate you set up collapses upon you.” After the end of the debate Koumoundurus who insists on the pre-interrogation committee in an announcement said: “The tragic image of Kyriakos Mitsotakis is an insult to the memory of the victims of the Tempes, their relatives and the Republic. Mr Mitsotakis remains challenging until the final fall. He refused Syriza’s proposal for the argument that we want to send Kostas Karamanlis to prison. Who told him that? We want to refer him to justice. Is the Prime Minister certain that if Mr Karamanlis is found before justice he will go to jail? Does he know anything we don’t know? He refused to answer who made the editing of the conversation given to the media to establish the prime minister verdict of human error. In his attempt to defend his sad arguments he even referred to the “state” ERT. We considered it public television. Does he know something we don’t? He officially admitted the bust for the first time but told us it was for a good cause. Shame!”.