Nikos Anadiotis for his nomination with “Victory”, abortions and childbearing by same-sex couples

In an interview he talks about his decision to deal with politics as a candidate for “” and is placed on abortions and childbearing by same-sex couples. In Status magazine and Sasha Stamatis, the actor spoke about his political career and the decision to run for candidate with the party “Victory”. Nikos Anadiotis also analysed his view of abortions and childbearing by same-sex couples and said: “In the time we live, the easiest thing is to remain apathetic in front of the mobile screen and ignore the commons. Unfortunately, that’s how we’re used to it and that’s how we’re used to it. But can we remain single when our society is leading us from evil to worse and our children are daily in enormous danger? Personally, I try to be close to my children and my family and protect them. But I must also care about the world in which my children will live, because I will not be there for them every moment and minute. Let me do what I can and leave the rest to God. With this good concern, I recently found myself on common racing paths with people of “Victory”. I met the president of “Victory”, Mr. Dimitris Nacios, and immediately I highly appreciated him as a man, as a teacher and as a family man. It was therefore next to accept with great joy and honour his invitation to help for everything I already believe through the “Wiccan” movement. With my candidacy I too want to contribute to the struggle of these people to bring about a real change in the political process of our country. And, from what I have seen with their presence so far, they do very well.” For abortions continue: “If I am not mistaken, in the Greek Constitution the primary right protected is that of life. And life is created “from the extreme conception”. That’s what I believe as a Christian Orthodox, that’s what science says. The fetus is an autonomous organism, with its own soul and its own inalienable right to life from the moment of conception. I am therefore appalled by the idea that the legislator defines with contractual papers whether we respect or deny an unprotected life that already exists. So, I think that the, within introductory, “right” of the so-called “self-determination of the body”, or whatever it is called, should not level the sacred and inalienable right of all of us to life. You live, live, we all live today only because our parents did the self-evident thing: They respected us and loved us more than any “self-determination””. Then the actor was asked what his opinion was on the birth of same-sex couples and in turn reported: “I believe that children are entitled to grow up in a healthy environment, with father and mother, as they show serious scientific research. Children need both parents. They need roles, templates, behaviors, as defined by natural laws. I cannot imagine that we deprive children of the right to say ‘mama’ or ‘dad’. Another thing about life’s difficulties leading there is that people do not properly observe the distinct roles they have as a father or mother and that the legislator legalize a traumatic shortage and accept it from the outset as normal. I’ve never met anyone who wants to grow up without a father or a mother. Let us support the traditional family and have much to gain as persons, as society and as a people from it.”