border areas, expresses in its communication to the WTO – OTA.
In detail, it is stressed:
“This is not the first time the co-presidency, TOO.REESE.A.-IF.EL. in the logic of the compression of wage costs puts you in the crosshairs of the few benefits that remain from the cuts of the previous time period, such as the Allowance of Remote-Border Regions and the Allowance for Dangerous and Unhealthy Work.
The first attempt of the coalition.REESE.A.-IF.EL. to “reform” the Benefit of Remote-Frontier Areas at the end of last year failed, due to the dynamic intervention of workers who are entitled to it. However, it seems that the co-presidency, TOO.REESE.A.-IF.EL. he insists, of a and in article 19 of the New york.4354/2015 included an enabling provision which provides that until 31 March 2016 will be issued a common Ministerial Decision that will redefines the criteria for the grant of the above allowance. In simple words you will “limit” the beneficiaries of the granting of the allowance or abolish it.
The operation to remove the Allowance of Remote-Border Regions is part of the continued policy of wage restraint. We call on the co-presidency may not proceed to any modification-a reform that will mean a new cut in the allowance in various areas during this period specially tested in addition, we Invite all employees who are entitled to the allowance and not only to be in daily racing vigilance”.
Source
WTO – OTA: “No” to the abolition of the allowance for remote areas
—