The motion of mistrust brought closer Syriza and PASOK: Why Kasselakis referred to “corobats”

What his and his officials have always spoken about in theory, cooperation in parliament came through the motion of mistrust tabled by Nikos Androulakis and to which the main opposition party contributed actively. It is typical that SYRIZA officials said that cooperation between the main opposition and PASOK parties was very good and particularly efficient in writing the text of the motion of censure, as the proposals of Koumoundourou were also accepted. They even noted that there was no climate of suspicion between both sides, but instead good mood and positive additions to create a text that includes all the issues that the two parties want to highlight. The climate of satisfaction in the main opposition party is particularly important, as the initial thought of many Kumoundurus officials was that the motion of disbelief may not have been needed at this time. It is also characteristic that in an article in “The Editors’ Paper”, Stefanos Kasselakis, while drafted with the motion of disbelief, spoke of a “corofighting”, a “process-show that will unfortunately accomplish nothing about the essence, the state cover-up of Tembon crime”. The author of the article actually recorded the doubts that some of the main opposition officials had long ago about Syriza moving forward with a motion of disbelief. What Stefanos Kasselakis appeared to believe about the parliamentary process was also commented within the Parliament by the Minister, despite Prime Minister Makis Voridis. They should have quit already. SYRIZA Secretary Rania Svigu said that government officials. “They should have already resigned. They have to leave immediately. By election. Stop the country’s downhill. To get rid of the government of the montage for the crime of the Tempes, accuracy, interception, breach of personal data and the rule of law.” The executives of Koumoundourou responded yesterday (26.03.2024) and why the president of Syriza requested the resignation of Kyriakos Mitsotakis and the country’s recourse to elections with the presence of international observers. As the partners of SYRIZA President said “the elections in Greece are always held with the presence of international observers. The same is true of all OSCE countries (the Security and Cooperation Agency in Europe). We are therefore not talking about an unprecedented practice of Greek data. They also said that in the last election (May 2023) specific recommendations have been made by the Office of Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR). ODIHR is the human rights institution of the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) They even added that… “The reason that the President of SYRIZA-PS, Stefanos Kasselakis, has been asked to assist the European Union in strengthening the observation in the elections, has to do with the very reasons why Kyriakos Mitsotakis’ resignation and recourse to parliamentary elections were immediately requested: For the action of a self-proclaimed executive state acting as a parastate at the expense of the functioning of the institutions and individual rights and civil liberties.” Institutional and democratic obstacles The same people pointed out that we are facing a government with a specific history of institutional and democratic handicaps: The alteration of sound documents on Tembe crime, in a way that strengthens the government account of human error, and the purpose, among other things, to influence justice’s investigations and conclusions accordingly, is “the drop that overflowed the glass.” Government agents associated with the prime minister’s office are controlled to step up the area of the Tembe tragedy, against the need for seamless investigation of the place of tragedy. In March, the embezzlement of the personal data of thousands of expatriates held by the Ministry of Interior, by the ND party, was admitted. Another scandal that raises an immediate issue of the election’s intransigence. Previously, we experienced a wiretap scandal by the NSA and through illegal surveillance software, which was enough to “throw” three governments and not just one.”