That’s the Europe of the 21st century?

Writes Kostas Lambos
The great european crisis which broke out in 2008, because of the divergence between the economies of the European North and the European South, leading to the Greek crisis…
the rapid rise of neo-fascism and the exit of Britain from the European Union, revealed the lack of static in the eu edifice, apparently because this was designed as a German-French living space and not as a common homeland of all the peoples of the European Continent. Fact that allows the development of nationalist illusions and centrifugal forces that prevent the deepening of european integration in the direction of the United States of Europe, and facilitate the disintegration of the Eurozone and of the European Union and return to the unhealthy nationalism of the 19th and the first half of the 20 century, which would serve, in particular, the neoliberal globalization of capital and the global hegemony of americanism.
In front of the version of the dissolution of the Eurozone and of the European Union and the transformation of Europe in the hinterland of the american empire, many are wondering where she’s going in Europe and what will be the future of Europe and the planet. The european institutions which have been established within the EU and under the pressure of the peoples of the eu member-states, have proved to be, despite the capitalist character to them, a serious impediment to globalization, as well as for the american and for the νεογερμανική hegemony in Many respects sound, and the proposals made represent, usually, the vision portion of the capital for Europe and not the vision of the forces of Labour, Science and Culture of the peoples of Europe:
The most reactive propose the dissolution of the EZ and the EU and return to national states, without recognizing that nation states are a phenomenon inherent with the emergence and flourishing of capitalism and not with the decline of the.
The ‘prudent’ social democrats propose speeding up the eu process with the upgrading of the European Parliament and of the transformation of the European Commission into a real european υπερκυβέρνηση of capital will continue to intercept the popular legitimacy.
Some techies suggest the ‘differentiated’, the selective completion, which would be reflected by groups of countries at different speeds, possibly of different currencies and policies, in the context of an accommodative EU which will continue to be absent from the local and national societies and their needs.
All of these proposals have a common philosophy, the philosophy of the for economic means the conservation of private property over the means of production, of competition to the bitter end for the maximization of private profit, the subordination of the society in the choices of capital and the expansion of economic, social, regional and national inequalities. Ie ‘one of the same and worse’.
The forces of Labour, Science and Culture, have repeatedly and in many ways shown their preference for a Europe of social equality, genuine democracy and universal peace.
The new social movements to the extent that they exceed the ideological and political dependence from the τριτοτεταρτοδιεθνιστική and anarchist left and the dogmatic rigidities lead to the conclusion that the current structure of the EU is hindered by the existing conditions and structures to evolve in the direction of a Europe of Peoples and for that choose the need for a radical overcoming of capitalist mode of production in all possible and impossible forms of actually existing capitalism and replacing it with a system of social democracy based on communal ownership for the purpose of economy of the common goods, in local direct democracy that is articulated in regional, national and global level with the content of the classless society and the end of a universal humanistic culture. It is obvious that this perspective assumes left and αυτενεργές, cohesive and cooperating with conscious, direct democratic societies that will build this world from the bottom up, tearing up all those institutions and structures that keep υπόδουλες and convert it into an object of exploitation, rather than being the subject of history.
Europe, if he wants to have a future, it must reconnect with the racing tradition and to star again in the humanity as a whole the next step in the μετακαπιταλιστική of course the prospect of a new un global humanitarian civilization. This is why the forces of Labour, Science and Culture are required to develop a new vision for Europe. A vision:
Will be built up in a progressive european identity with content, social equality, and a form of direct democracy.
Will the release from the american kit.
I’ll relieve you from the Nightmare of νεογερμανισμού.
I’ll remove her from νοσηρότητες global american hegemony, or maybe some αμερικανογερμανικής, or αμερικανορωσικής, or αμερικανοκινεζικής capitalist συνηγεμονίας.
Will the driving out of capitalism and the capitalist barbarity.
Will subdue economic activity in society through ownership and social self-management.
Will organise the social life of the local communities and peoples on the basis of the common goods and of the classless republic of [the Confederation Αμεσοδημοκρατικών States of Europe.
Many consider this the Europe utopia, but they forget that the utopia is only the image that societies have for their own Tomorrow. They forget also that Tomorrow becomes Today a reality, which is the day after Tomorrow is Yesterday, which means that the history of mankind is written as a realization of utopias that lead firmly in social equality, in a classless society, and Humanism.
Alternative, offer of neo-liberal globalisation, for Europe and the mankind is the capitalist barbarism.
If you don’t cancel in time will incur as a new digital middle ages and as the planned ‘end of history’.