Paul Marinakis for Tembi: The publication is misleading

The newspaper’s publication The Step for editing in the Temp case was commented by government spokesman Paul Marinakis. Speaking to Mega the government spokesman said the Temby report is misleading by telling features. “If one sees the analysis the editor makes in the newscast the day before the newspaper’s publication, it will understand that impeachment is clear. The editing service is not addressed to an employee or journalist. I don’t think anyone accused a clerk or a journalist. It shouldn’t have leaked what was leaked, and I’m saying this about all the cases. The whole story was intended to build another narrative – apart from what we already have to deal with – about a cover-up for Tembis by the government. The report is misleading and was building a narrative that was completely misleading. In other words: as I explained yesterday, a matter of leaking evidence of a case tried the “Step” to upgrade it to a matter of misleading public opinion. It’s a light. ‘Montaziera’ means the alteration of a content in order to mislead public opinion or to attribute responsibilities to a person. It wasn’t the only conversation, all the other conversations advocated human error. In the evening those talks were published that did not really have any series. But did the station chief confess at noon? So was it the issue of the “bad” government or someone else – that I cannot find who – to mislead citizens that it is human error while it is a matter solved?”, he said initially. And Mr Marinakis continued: “Given third: the next day justice takes all the talks including the one you published at MEGA full but complete. So there’s no question of legal tampering. Fourth, on the 3rd and 4th of the month, all sites including ERT post the entire chat, including it without any difference from what you read to me. When in a period of 3 days the press presents to the public full talks and all of them go to justice one cannot claim a year later for a montage.” “Police on the evening of the publication of the “Step” issued an announcement on how point was taken how all of the talks went in court. For a year we have 57 victims, thus 57 families of victims, people involved in the case, etc. and not one has made this impeachment that the “step” made. There’s no point in having a conversation about imaginary cases and throwing mud in the fan. In our country we have a distinction between powers. “Step” or opposition did not come Sunday to say why there was a leak of evidence, The “Step” came and then the opposition and said “why it became a montage”. The point here is human error. Does anyone question the aspect of the human factor beyond the other aspects?” the government representative then stressed. The government representative said about justice and talks: “No one has opened the issue that justice has been falsified or half or lacking the conversations of all fatal trains and the order of events. But the whole of the integrators chat has gone from police to justice. It’s all part of the judicial investigation. We have to let justice do its job. In this case some tried to create false impressions. We are outraged to have some from another political space, in the pain of people saying that we cover up murderers or anyone. When someone tries to suspect something which seems to be false and misleading we have a duty to answer.”