Without the adoption of the decision of the European Court of justice in case of collective redundancies in the Heracles, it is very likely to close the…
negotiation of government – institutions in relation to collective redundancies.
This was stated by a top executive of the ministry of Labour in the informal meeting with editors, when asked about how to close the negotiation for the collective redundancies until December 5, while is not provided until then to the decision of the European Court of justice for the case of Heracles.
It is recalled that, until recently, the consistent position of the ministry of Labour was that for any debate between the Greek side and of the institutions, but also for the final decision for changes in overall institutional framework that governs collective redundancies, you must first be issued the decision of the ΕυÏωδικαστηÏίου for AGET. However, because the IMF is pressuring you to discuss the particular subject – independent judgments – and to raise the thresholds of collective redundancies, the debate is expected to begin directly between the two sides.
The Greek side is refusing any increase in limit redundancy and only accepts to disengage partially from the procedures of the relevant decisions. In particular, the ministry of Labour proposes that there is at least preliminary approval of the collective redundancies agreed employees – employers before they take place.
The same sources say that the IMF disagrees with any change in the method of fixing the minimum wage of a, and considers the existing institutional framework as a “flagship overthrow” (p.p. the minimum wage fixed by the state).
Moreover, cycles of the ministry of Labour indicate that the Greek side is not discussing any change in the existing institutional framework concerning the right to strike, but proposes the creation of an electronic registry to the trade unions.
Source
It opens the debate on collective dismissals, in the absence of the ΕυÏωδικαστηÏίου
—