Folli Follie: Points for persons who contributed to the collapse

On the third day of his apology, Dimitris Koutsolioutsos’ founder “throwed” spikes for persons who contributed to her collapse, without giving names, denying all the charges attributed to him and speaking not to illegal alteration of evidence but to “motivating the image of the company”. At the same time, Folli Follie’s founder stated that he was not involved in economics, but in the production process, while stressing that he should not resign when the scandal broke out. Taking all responsibility from both George’s son and his wife Kate Koutsolitsu, but also from his other co-conspirators, for whom he said that “they have nothing to do with” the protagonist of the so-called Folli Follie scandal blamed two wanted for the case, executives of the Asian branch of the group. “They thought to increase turnover in financial statements”. According to Dimitris Koutsolioutsos, there were persons who contributed to the collapse of the company for which he stressed that even now he believes “that he has potential, as long as new investors appear, which will happen once the current ones leave.” The defendant also turned against audit companies that carried out financial checks and handed to Justice findings, questioning the procedures that followed. As the defendant mentioned the issue of “moving the image of the company” caused a conflict with his son who said that “we were almost not talking”. For his wife’s involvement the defendant pointed out that she had no responsibilities and that she was given the title of Vice President “honored evic”. The defendant attributed the “molecularization” to mere “industriousness and vision”, while saying that he in Hong Kong was engaged in the factories to begin the absurdity of clocks rather than economics. He also stressed, referring to the amount of EUR 240 million that was non-existent in the file, that the money was in bank accounts. “We asked for them because wages and commodities had to be paid. It’s just that nothing was investigated. They were called Douche. There was money in all the companies. The money was in the company but not in that bank account. The issue is who directs control?”. Finally, he denied that the Asia Group was “imaging” by saying it was strategically important and important, because it was the production unit for products that went around the world, but at the same time also a point of promotion of these products, as the major markets were China, Hong Kong and Korea. As he said, the turnover was around 400m euros. SOURCE: RES-BE