and with respect to international and european rules, point out circles of the ministry of Environment and Energy.
The same sources are rejecting reports that show that will have the responsibility for a potential wreck in the case of the privatisation of DESFA, stressing that far from the reality and objective serve limited political ends, and noted, inter alia, the following:
The change in the conditions of competition that limits the rate of ΑζÎÏικης SOCAR to 49%, was held by the Competition Directorate of the EU.
The side of the Azeri (SOCAR) it seeks to change the terms, aiming to give the whole of the assets of the company to the Public to resign, at the same time, from his own share. How to evaluate such a behavior of a candidate investor? How is consistent with a new investment plan that will develop the company?
Those who claim that the last amendment of the government (which are regulated charges that will be levied by the DESFA by consumers) that is obstructing the investment climate and endanger the nomination of SOCAR, they are required to tell us if he served the investment climate with an increase of 68% at the end of use of the network that translates into increased energy costs for domestic production and households.
“It’s obvious”, they end up circles in the RIS, “that the drones reports in the last few weeks of a want to undermine the energy – development policy of the government and on the other attempting to pass on her responsibilities for a possible withdrawal of SOCAR, which will be due eventually, if you happen, other causes”.
Explanations for the evolution of the privatization of DESFA
—