“It is dangerous to be right when the power is wrong,†said Voltaire….
Those who voted before a right time NO in the referendum they believed they were right. But the government was wrong…
And he was wrong because he believed that with the tool of the referendum will blackmail the community and υπεÏτλαντικά decision-making centres. And the result after the incredible post-election political rigging of the conversion of NO to YES was to the question: “Finally, who rules this place?â€
This phrase, which unfortunately has become cliché in the last few years had used the Konstantinos Karamanlis the elder in June 1963. The occasion then the general outcry which had ξεσήκωσει the murder of Lambrakis, and the interventions in the Justice for covering up the moral perpetrators of the murder. Today we may not have a similar situation like the murder of the fighter of the ECN, but we have in progress another peculiar “murder”. The “murder” σÏσσωμης of the Greek economy, and by extension Greek society.
A society that indignant dared to raise his head and with a rate of close to 62% to say that out loud you don’t want to continue this torture of the drop that is massacring an entire people and mortgaging the future of the new generation.
Question remains how many of the 62% of the Greek people were ready to pull the rope until it breaks, and prepared for any adverse consequences of their vote. You don’t have to know a and the apprentices, mages of the government baptised the fish meat!
But it turns out he was absolutely right Francois Mitterrand when he said that the citizens in the referendums usually respond to all, except for the question in the referendum.
And the question in this referendum was: “we Must accept the draft agreement which have been submitted by the European Commission, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund, the Eurogroup of 25/06/2015 and consists of two parts which constitute a single proposal: The first document is entitled “Reforms for the completion of the Current Program and beyond” (Reforms to the completion of the current programme and beyond) and the second “Preliminary Dept Sustainability Analysis” (preliminary debt sustainability analysis). If the citizens of the country reject the proposal of the three institutions they vote: Not approved/NO. If the citizens of the country agree with the proposal of the three institutions vote: Approved/YES”.
Who remembers the question a year later? And maybe it’s just because everything that followed, and the measures taken proved to be πολλαπλασίως more painful than what included the question of the referendum.
A year after the referendum so that the Greek society is in a coma. The recent suicide Mamidakis and the fire in the Costco confirm an extremely harrowing, and mainly status quo which was also confirmed by the latest forecasts for recession and 2016.
The government fails glaringly to respond even in the role of dispatcher, and rulers are foreigners, while the opposition looks more little than ever.
The trust of the people on the occasion of the last referendum has been lost in the political system. And when we lose trust in the political system in general, some people are rubbing their hands.
The political world of the country is weak. Government mortified, parties in opposition in dissolution, and at the same time creating new political actors.
But the most important and the ανησυχητικότεÏο is how the great upheaval in the political landscape may bring about unpredictable consequences up to and political anomalies…
You will see….
Source
A time of political rigging in the referendum and today’s concerns
—