Theoharis go to SW for?

“I can deny them. In a word, is more explicit…
the rebuttal is. If I start and I say a lot, it’s worse. I deny this information,” said a member of the River Haris Theoharis for the information that when the elections are called, will accede to the SW.
Speaking to the radio station Athens 984, mr. Theoharis explained the decision to resign from the position of a parliamentary representative: “I Expressed very clearly specific disagreements in the way in which moving the River the last time, at political, organisational and strategic level. These disagreements had the opportunity to present at the conference, as a climax of critical and logical to me… I did Not make any issue of leadership. Stavros Theodorakis is the undisputed head of the movement. I thought -and I think that is the most correct and honest attitude – that we need to continue to be a member and to help the River from this place. The position of the parliamentary representative has increased obligations for representation of the positions of the head and, obviously, if I have some specific objections, I can’t convincingly support these positions. The whole world knows that at some points I disagree”.
Fill in that “if you don’t make changes, and this effort comes to an end, I have a duty -in terms of policy, of dignity – have told in a timely manner, in order to make these changes. Otherwise, I’ll be responsible and we will bring part of the responsibility. I don’t want to lose the River, and, in any case, if it is lost, I don’t want to have part of the responsibility…
There is always a real time to make some changes. I believe that the time is there and the capabilities in the head, who is all-powerful on the River. He was re-elected with a strong majority. Therefore, I don’t see why they can’t make any decisions. Can and the estimates I do are wrong. Can the River really be able to walk with comfort, without a problem, having the strategy that had been decided. In this case, I’ll be happy, even if my estimates are wrong”.
He said, “there’s an invisible dividing line between particularly of regional organisations and the central, and the political strains of the River”, noting that “if we are not able to get through it, if we can’t, and organisational and essentially to reconnect these two parts, we have a problem, in fact,” and added: “it’s part of what I said, what needs to be done to enable the River to re-establish. We need to reconnect with society. What he did two years ago, which was a big “bang” activation of society, we need to do it again, if it wants to survive. That’s what I asked”.
Source

Exit mobile version