The pathogens of the subsidized programme ‘Move Electrically 3’

I had pointed it out in time, that the subsidized program “Move Electric 3”, will be exhausted before its deadline, which is 30 April 2025. The program was launched in August 2020 by the government’s decision to release “green” vehicles, which do not pollute, subsidizing the purchase of electric cars, motorcycles and bicycles. And here is the one pathogeny, as conventional bicycles do not pollute, but only tire more with the fives. CORVERSE The project was undertaken by the Ministry of Environment and Energy with a budget of EUR 100 million , for individuals and companies , and provided for the submission of an application for the purchase of an electric vehicle, the payment of the full purchase price, the examination of the application by the Ministry and subsequently the reimbursement of the subsidy amount. The second subsidised programme , with a budget of EUR 50 million , brought very good sales results and prompted the purchase of electric vehicles despite major delays in the examination of applications . This problem was resolved in part by passing the project to the Ministry of Infrastructure and Transport before its completion . But there still remained a lot of problems. ADVERSE Now, in programme 3 implemented with a budget of 33m euros , opening the application platform no one knows whether there will be any money left to be subsidised. And it is a typical example, because anyone who enters the website of the “Move Electric 3” will see that of the 199.825,84 euros, only EUR 129.85 for a vehicle subsidy and EUR 188.834,13 for a bicycle subsidy remains. Another pathogen. Also, 10,861,86 remain for businesses that want to acquire an electric vehicle. With applications being examined at a faster rate, they commit or release money and enter the system again, but still this process is like the torment of the drop. The car market is waiting for the government’s decisions if it will find an extra budget to strengthen programme 3 and stimulate the purchase of electric vehicles, but the government, at the moment, probably has other issues to solve. Given that it is one of the few governments in Europe that continue, and in a brave way, the policy of benefit, we do not find it strange if we do not have a 4 programme or if it is gossiped. We’re here. We are currently staying with the following points, which have been the pathogens of the system since the first day. Why would electric bicycles that were basically bought by robust hobbyists rather than people to go to work more easily every day? Why not find a way to automatically remove the subsidy amount by buying electricity? With electronic data crossings, is everything possible? Carrying indisposed money from one category (bicycles) to another (vehicles) is a pathogen, but it is difficult to avoid, unless bicycle subsidy is abolished. No income criteria were set for the acquisition of an electric vehicle, from the outset, except for a maximum price (the retail price before tax) of EUR 50,000. This resulted in many who had a good to very good financial condition of an electric vehicle, either for first or for second in the family, as they had to pay all the money, unlike a hired man who was hard to find 40,000 or 50,000 cash. The government while setting income criteria on social tourism programmes, for example, on such a matter held another stance.