The Great Indian Civilization Overtook The Total Slave System In Ancient Social Transitional Phases In The Indian Society By Jumping Out The Slave Sys

The Great Indian Civilization Overtook The Total Slave System In Ancient Social Transitional Phases In The Indian Society By Jumping Out The Slave Sys

The Great Indian civilization overtook the total slave system in ancient social transitional phases in the Indian society by jumping out the slave system of Greeks, Babylonians and     Europeans as a different way of Marxism, in India

Without going into the different controversies on the period of Manu, on whose name, the Manu code of laws, in India is well known and it has been established its credibility as well as notoriety from the history of its translation , and having no reason to raise any question  in mind  in setting aside of its applicability by many political parties  and finding no fault on rejection  of Vishva  Hindu  Parishad in India during the life time of dr. Baba sahib Ambedkar, whose Manu dahan divas, 25 December 1927 was celebrated by Dalits ,and feeling no happiness over  distancing vhp from owning Manusmriti by the Vishva Hindu Parishad in 2006. Manu smriti have its total verses, 2685, In which only verses 1214 are authentic as claimed by Sri Surendra Nath. Here no attempt could be made in any form  either to invite any controversies on declarations here on such verses for interpolations or in supporting the  remaining the other verses of 1471 in the Manu Code of Laws.

.Manu Smriti, has been translated by Mr. G. Buhler as’ laws of Manu’ he had an opinion about its composition that it is made in1500 B.C and it is one of the eighteen Smritis. .Most of  Hindu organizations in its web sites claims that its composition period was 200 C.E in India. Though the periods may different upon its composition, Manu, who has composed Manu Code of Laws with his identification, noting  the very existence of surrounding territories, rivers, and other social classes at that time. He is known as law giver of the Indian civilization with all rules he set according to his own way in differentiating every human being with the categorization of others by following the set of rules from the birth to death with all ceremonies and sacrifices for all the people of his fold what he aspired from the people as Brahman, Kshtriya, Kaisya, and Sudra who claimed Sudras to serve these three cast’s people as their occupation authoritatively in the 1st of 91st verse

One occupation only the lord prescribed to the Sudra to serve meekly even these (other) three castes’. 

Dr. Ambedkar was very much particular about the untouchables during the freedom struggle under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi. Both were already set their different agendas in the independence struggle. The agitations they led in different ways as their thoughts were in the sense and spirit on each others’ diversified causes at that time of freedom movement,  The communist party of India, under the influence of the Stalin, took a separate way against the Gandhiji’s way in India in line of keeping the coalition forces in the global level against the Hitler

 Dr Ambedkar was known for his capabilities in presenting the issues before the people and his writings were still influential and inspirational to the Dalits and downtrodden from that period to present day. Unfortunately his writings and his capabilities were not recognized by all sections of the society as he has stood in his entire life for the Dalit causes which were known in the sacred Hindu texts as Sudras in the Manu Smriti and all the right wing including leftist writers in India has the same mind set in writing the history and giving the impression of European style of social transformations to the Indian history from their own point of view. The origin, and  meaning, with its applications to the people for the identities what the Rig Veda was referred to are still not yet confirmed by the concerned with its subject such as ‘Dasa’, ‘Dasyu’, and the Aryans

 The very next sacred text ‘Manu code of  laws’ which is regarded as the next text to sacred Vedas and its authenticity could be verified within the purview of all four Vedas as the next to all Vedas. And it has the limitation to take the code of laws of Manu, into consideration within the contradiction between Vedas and the Smritis, It is decided to finalize that the Vedas version first to take into consideration by rejecting the Smritis version against Vedas before arriving to any conclusions. Analytical way within two different identities were once treated as the progressive methodology in finding out the factors from the history, was followed by all most all the historians in finding the rights from the wrongs from the ancient history and collecting the wrongs from the rightists parties are the duties of the rightist parties in India. Representing the race, clan, or religion within the limit of Indian social fabric in India was and is the common factor as it has taken the shape of universal need of all the active players in their respective fields in certain times on few subjects only. The laws of Manu, covered all phases of the human being and all the members of the society, and he wanted to follow the rules what he proposed before them. Here the point only is to bring out the definition and applicability of the word, Manu used in his all the laws referred ‘slaves’,’ male slaves’, ‘and female slaves’ only in his code of laws of Manu in Indian civilization.

 Where as the definition with its applications of the words ‘slave’ and ‘female slave’ from the context of the Hammurabi code of laws to the code of laws of Manu have analyzed comparatively with more inspirational zeal than applicability of the ‘great leap forward’     in  identifying the small elements within the sphere of the available contradictions by jumping out in a lead as well in advance to the developments of the Greek,  Egyptian, Babylonian,  Sumerian,  Acadian, European, roman, British and American civilizations. The Aristotle, and Plato, was the philosophers who supported the slavery as they were engaged in finding the definitions of the whole society of the globe with practicalities in the limited cities of Athens and Sparta

 In the old testament of the Bible which was supported the slavery and its predominant slave system of that society at that time was supported as we all are aware about it.

Hammurabi code of laws, which is the world’s first code of laws, composed by the king himself and it was composed in the year 1780 B.C. The Hammurabi Code of Laws was enacted by the 6th Babylonian king. This code was founded in 1901, by Egyptologist, Gustov  Jaquir. It has been translated George Buhler, there are 282 laws including missing portions of the code from sl no 66 to 99. The no of missed laws are 34. All clarification by using the brackets in both laws was the work of the writers of subjects in the source what it has been taken here in this article.

Following laws are with reference to the word ‘slave’ and its relevancy in all the subjects wherever it has its relation with other people during the transactions of the society at that time. The king Hammurabi was well known to the world and renowned one for the codification of the royal duties in Babylonian territory for next generations. To verify the very nature of Babylonian’s social structure in comparison with the very same first codification of the laws in India by Manu and it has been known as the Code of Laws of Manu. Codifications of the laws are always helpful in understanding the very structural nature of the societies of that time

 The time of both code of laws have a greater gap between the two societies, at least there is a gap of 1500 to 1650 years. The slavery and its origin and growth are well known by ll those who are interested in such studies. It is also a question just why the Indian social transformation was not taken place in the similar line of all other ancient societies from the Egyptian pharaohs’ societies to, if I say even back from the period of domestication of animals to forming a civilizations in Babylonians, to the present European, roman and British in which all the social transformations were the same as Karl Marx described in his communist manifesto

.There is a gap in the Indian history. And it has the blanks in its own history. So that the spirituality and mythology of a particular, right wing is in aggressive way of owning the whole history in accordance with their mythological subjects for their political reasons.. There is a gap in resuming a leading roll in bringing out the evidences to the world as an official and in recognized form of archeological supports. At the same time the left wing historian’s orientations were in same of British who have done a lot before leaving India in almost in historical works of religious books from Sanskrit to English. Before taking any role in writing the real historical issues with Indian subject in exact way by the right historian, the rightist were in their lead with all subjects without archaeological evidences on the subjects.

 So here is the way available, through which a comparative analysis could be carried out for the understanding of the social transformation with its active players towards progress and prosperity. Here are some laws to understand the slave societies’ rules and its related actions on violations of the social laws at that time through the comparison of Manu code of laws. Following is the seventh law in The Code of Laws of Hammurabi,  in which the slave with gold, or silver, by the way of contract compared, in presence of witness for the sale process between the buyer and offered

7) ‘If anyone buy from the son or a slave of another man, without witness or a contract silver or a gold, a male or a female slave or an ox or a sheep or any thing or if he take

It in charge, he is considered as a thief and shall be put to death’.

 In the 3rd chapter of Manu Smriti, the first time the word ‘slave’ is taken place referring the direct verse to