SYRIZA: The second round duo that stood out in the debate – Kasselakis’ ghost and Famelou-Polakis kons

In the shadow of the two forthcoming independences – Theodora Jackris and Giota Pulou – which will deprive the position of the main opposition took place yesterday (20.11.2024) the much-discussed among the candidates of the Kumoundour party. Despite the apparent developments the main opposition officials appear satisfied by yesterday’s debate, as they say, after a long time and that after the conference it was freed from the toxicity of the Kasselakis period. In the whole process the duo of the election contest was cleared up. Socrates Famellus and Paul Polakis, were clearly the two persons who had confrontations and showed themselves to stand out in the election race. Very close appeared to be Nicholas Farantouris, while Apostolos Gletsos moved based on his experience in local government. As expected, the face of Stefanos Kasselakis occupied the discussion. By commenting on the criticism made by the former president to Syriza he said: “Mr. Kasselakis because he has taken the downhill and deflates, starts using arguments from the second underground of the Truth group returning to the factory settings of his Republican past”. Socrates Famelos said that “when many serious problems were accumulated leading to the shrinking and devaluing of Syriza not only me but almost all SYRIZA executives in the majority of them began to worry.” The MP of Chania even presented evidence of Stefanos Kasselakis’s background saying that he was a fake. At the target of the former president was also found Apostolos Gletsos stressing that at the conference “the fallen president of SYRIZA chose in his favorite way to bring people out of the conference to create impressions. It was full of buses.” Nicholas Farantouris, for his part, pointed out that Sunday’s election process is Syriza’s last chance, who pointed out that with a charter conference it could be decided whether the party would remain in the Left’s Eurogroup or “move” to the Euro-socialists. With regard to the confrontations and these had their interest, as Socrates Famelos asked Paul Polakis clearly insinuating why he did not pass the bill on same-sex couples. His MP of Chania replied that it was a trade which he cannot accept, nor about heterosexual couples. Socrates Famellus was forced to give answers about the party’s disagreement to refer to elections last February. As he said, what he proposed was the interest and the need for Syriza to be led to the European elections together. Of particular interest was that Socrates Famellus suggested that Paul Polakis had not voted for the criterion of where he intended to appoint a candidate for the presidency. “Obviously I voted for it, Socrates and I tabled it first,” the MP of Chania replied. There was also a confrontation between Nicolas Farantouris and Paul Polakis on the issue of the fallen president. “You took by hand and supported with soul and body a completely unknown, whom you did not see to unsearch”. “ Finally I searched him out, ” replied Paul.