Close marking makes the government on their subject in order to deconstruct the account of the Maximus Megaron that “it facilitates research and does not cover up”. As PASOK officials say about the Tembes case “it is indicative that government propaganda has come to the point of proclaiming that the motion of mistrust over the corrupt sound of the stationmaster who had been channeled to public opinion over its manipulation has fallen.” CORVERSE Meanwhile, the same people point out that just this morning the government representative admitted that there is no connection between the outcome of the EMP and the falsified sound channeled to a media. While for the National Organisation for the Investigation of Railway and Air Accidents and Transport Safety, their criminal responsibilities were demonstrated, as Mr Karamanlis had not staffed him, which became 6 months after the tragedy! “The government is trying to present much later and late initiatives to “justify” that there was nothing wrong. After the latest developments, she should have realized that the only way to save any credibility left is to respond carelessly to the citizens’ demand for justice, transparency and accountability. Instead she is challengingly continuing the truth distortion operation in favour of micro-party management. Fatal and unrepentant make their own deficiency and insubordination on a major issue of political direction of the country,” Harilau Trikoupis said. They still point out that whenever the New Democracy is in a difficult position, the government account is “destabilization”. “But there is no more escape route for the government of corruption and cover-up. Citizens know that the country’s interests are not the narrow party interests of the New Republic or the Prime Minister’s rescue,” PASOK officials said. ‘Key’ cross-reference the polls Meanwhile, many discussions have brought to PASOK the issue of cooperation that began through the issue of the Presidency of the Republic and continued through discussions on parliamentary initiatives on Tempes. Naturally, these issues opened up the debate on the centre left with many Harilaos Trikoupis executives supporting such a possibility by demanding, at a time when associates of Nikos Androuliakis appear not to wish to have any discussion on this issue for the time being. Information says the leader of the main opposition faces this issue in psychological terms. As people who know him for the time being, Nikos Androulakis does not seem willing to discuss such a possibility, as he insists that now is the opportunity for PASOK to prove that it may be the alternative to the NW. As they point out, however, the same people in the event that the main opposition party fails to break free from the psychological limit of 17% by making a polling leap of over 20% then PASOK and Nikos Androulakis himself should review their goal. Of course, in this story it will play a special role and the time that PASOK will review its tactics. Because it is obviously different to start a process of approach with the other parties of the Left in a year when this scenario can mature and another to address SYRIZA and the New Left just before the election, realizing that you are facing a dead end. Nikos Androulakis himself, however, seems not to be in a hurry, as he appreciates that if his party is established in the Centre, then the voters with more left characteristics will come to PASOK as the only option for ND to leave. In an interview the leader of the main opposition however appointed who he can work with saying: “We go autonomously and in my own government there will be neither drachmists nor yet far-right. The question is whether the Prime Minister can declare this too…”. So for the time being Nikos Androuliakis appears to close any discussion on cooperation with the parties of the Left despite the fact that both Paul Geroulanos, Michael Katrinis, Theodore Margaritis had attempted some time ago to put the collaborations at the table at Harilaou Trikoupi.
PASOK: “Key” for the possibility of co-operation – Presing to the government for Tempes
—
in Policy