Lanois for PAOK – AEK: “Penalty and miscarriage on Vietska, Otto had to get a red card too”

He analysed the dietary decisions of the PAOK derby – , with the French Chief Referee reporting that Vietska and Yoni The homeowners had to be expelled, and no penalty was given for the Union. In the established video of EPO with the analysis of the contested phases of the 21st race by Stefan Lanois, the derby PAOK – AEK was in the spotlight. And that’s because Csweyer’s decisions were alleged to be quite wrong, as the French Chief Referee pointed out. CORVERSE In particular, Lanois argues that Tsweyer had to expel PAOK’s Wietesca for an elbow out of phase to Pierrot and give a penalty for AEK in the first half, which the German even though he saw in the VAR never did. At the same time, in the second 45 minutes of the derby had to be expelled either by direct red or by second yellow card Yoni Otto of the hosts for hitting the caps of his shoe at Hatzisafi, AEK, with the referee not making the right decision, after letting the game continue. In detail the words from Lanois For the Vietesca phase with Pieros: DIVERSE “Here the defender behind the referee hits his elbow opponent in the face. It’s violent contact. We expect the VAR to be intervened, and we expect the right technical and disciplinary decision to be taken. Penalty, red card for violent contact”. For branding Yoni Otto to Hajishafi: “Here the player of PAOK with No.19, who already has a yellow card, touches his opponent low on the back, with the foot slipping without speed or intensity. If the referee shows a red card, the VAR can support the decision. We expect at least a yellow card for clear risk-free branding.” And the penalty shot of Athanasios in Panetolikos… Fearless: “In this case the defender risks hitting the ball his hand by throwing out as a goalkeeper. He touches the ball with his left hand, while heading towards the finish, making his body abnormally larger. We are waiting for VAR intervention, as was done, for the penalty to be charged.”