He in his established video with the analysis of the contested phases of the race, stressed that in derby – AEK, the phase with Dragovski branding on Vida is not a penalty, as it has been preceded by the footballer of the guests. Several doros was after the 19th Super League race, with the game of Panathinaikos and AEK being overshadowed by the phase in which Dragovski knocks Vida down at the beginning of the match, with the people of the Union protesting against no penalty charge from the referee of the Espen Escas race. Stefan Lanula took a position, with the president of the CED arguing that at the beginning of the phase there is an aggressive foul, so rightfully the derby’s infantry does not account for the extreme penalty. CORVERSE At the same time, the same game refers to the goal of Fotis Ioannidis who did not count, while Ese’s penalty was entered in the microscope in Athanasios, in the game Atromitos – Olympiacos. The analysis of Lanois For Dragovski’s phase with Vida: “Here the goalkeeper tries to catch the ball in the air. Because of this contact with the opponent, even if involuntary, the goalkeeper lost possession of the ball and embraced the opponent within the area. In this case, the referee must protect the goalkeeper and give foul to the defending team.” CORVERSE For the cancellation of Fotis Ioannidis’ second goal in derby with AEK: “It is a violation if a player scores immediately after the ball touches his hand, even if it was not intentional. Here we expect the VRA to call the referee, because he lost two cases, first to the attacker and then to the defender and the goal must be cancelled.” For Ese’s penalty to Athanasius: “Here the player with Olympiacos’ 32 fell into foul after viewing the opponent. First the VAR must check whether the incident took place within or outside the area and then confirm the referee’s decision: Penalty”. For the cancellation of Fotis Ioannidis’ second goal in derby with AEK: “It is a violation if a player scores immediately after the ball touches his hand, even if it was not intentional. Here we expect the VRA to call the referee, because he lost two cases, first to the attacker and then to the defender and the goal must be cancelled.” For the penalty won by Star AKTOR against the Levadeic: “In this case the defender touches the ball by hand, after having made his body abnormally larger. Having his hand in this position the player takes the risk of hitting his hand and blaming the penalty. We are waiting for VAR intervention, as was done, for the penalty to be charged.” For Bettankor’s goal, with which Panseraikos made 2–0 against Lamia: If you missed it 18:24 Tuesday 21.01 17:56 Tuesday 21.01 17:38 Tuesday 21.01 17:10 Tuesday 21.01 “Here we wait for VAR intervention, which was not done, to cancel the finish for a clear foul to which the attacker fell holding his opponent and making irregular projection during the attack”
Lanois for Panathinaikos – AEK: “Vida’s offensive foul on Dragovski, no penalty”
—
in Sports