The co-operation scenarios were ruled out by his president saying he does not want to have far-right or dramatists in his own cabinet. “Babulas does not exist. You vote PASOK, you will have PASOK in the government,” Nikos Androuliakis stressed in an interview with SKAI, arguing that what he has said has nothing to do with what has been moved in the past. CORVERSE He stressed that the goal of PASOK is to leave the government and to come that to the government, while he commented that the discussion about partnerships “opened innately from the South due to the Tashoula choice, because it is an anti-institutional option, which turns its back on the Centre, and tries to build a new bogeyman that you vote Androulaki and comes out Varoufakis. What Greek can believe that this thing can happen?” “I said something simple, in the next election or the ND will be self-sufficient or PASOK will be self-sufficient or neither one of them will be involved. This is not something special, it is something that is general and applies anyway,” he said. He stressed that the message that she constantly sends to the Greek people is that “we have today a government that has created a collapse of the NSS, in public education, has taken off accuracy, there are huge institutional issues and I want to tell the citizens that whoever wants the ND to leave because it feels uncertainty about its future, voting PASOK succeeds, succeeds with its vote in PASOK to remove ND.” Our goal is for the New Democracy to leave the government and PASOK to come “It is obviously not wise to say which parties will be in 2027, because nobody knows and I never said it,” he stressed and stressed: “I say something simple: PASOK’s goal is to leave the New Republic from the government and PASOK come to government. So any citizen who wants to leave today’s policy of accuracy, disrespect in institutions and inequalities, with his vote in PASOK has a political change in another direction.” “What are you talking about?” he commented on the question whether she would work with the South if she was the first party in 2027 without self-reliance and asked for cooperation. Androuliakis stressed that he struggled all these years “to become the impossible”, i.e. to get PASOK back to the point where he could face the NW. CORVERSE In relation to the charge of the ND towards PASOK regarding partnerships, Mr.Androulakis noted that “if the people honor me and I have a mandate to make government, people Drachmists or followers of Lepin and European far-right and neo-Naziism I will not have my own government. Mr Mitsotakis has such?”. He argued that “the prime minister and his power system are making a narrative of a bogeyman who says we will work with the extremes and the dramatists. I ask the Greek people: to date, have I worked with the forces that may cause a problem in the stability of the country and its prospects? The one who filed a complaint with me? When it took Velopoulos to alter the composition of ADE, Velopoulos voted for the proposal Mitsotakis. In the budget was voted the ND and some Spartans MPs, namely Golden Dawn. A year and a half we had tabled an amendment so that the Spartans would not get money and a year and a half the South did nothing and winked at them.” “So when the time comes I promise that in my cabinet they will be neither far-right nor drachmas,” he stressed. When asked about views expressed by PASOK officials on partnerships, he commented that “our officials should tell them in the bodies of the movement.” He stressed that “we have made elections and we have made a political decision which was also my central decision: autonomous march and victory over the South. Just clean. This is the strategic decision not only mine, but also the world of PASOK and so we will march until the next national elections.” Mitsotakis sacrificed the political tradition of national consensus to have internal party consensus In relation to the choice of Mr. Mitsotakis for Constantine Tashoulas for the presidency of the Republic, Mr.Androuliakis described the Prime Minister as unreliable for his attitude, since in 2019 he said that he did not change the spirit of the Constitution for broad consents. As to why he did not submit an advance proposal, he replied that if he had made the same “wrong” as Syriza, he would have given “a divine gift” to Mr. Mitsotakis could have said that PASOK did not want consent and thus went to his own person. Androuliakis said that with the strategy that he himself followed respecting the institution and not entering a nomenclature, he succeeded in exposing the Prime Minister to the Centre’s world, “sacrificing the political tradition of national consensus to have internal party consensus”. Which he described as insulting to institutions and people. The President of PASOK said, among other things, that he proposed Tasos Giannitsis “to symbolize that we want to rule the country, consistently with moral responsibility with a serious experience with a European strategy.” Call on the people to think about what the Giannitsi proposal stands for and what the Tasula proposal stands for. He commented that with the proposal Katseli Syriza “trying to symbolically use the name of PASOK during the difficult years of the memos to protect the first residence”, a law “that Syriza did not then vote for by saying that they are bank games. We are a productive, serious, reliable and effective opposition. On whether PASOK will vote for Nikitas Kaklamanis for Speaker of the House said that “the KO of the party will meet and make its decision on how to move for the Speaker of the House.” Asked to comment on the polling image of PASOK said our struggle is long and there will certainly be moments of stagnation after a significant rise. He added that “the struggle is ahead of us and we have a lot to do” and that PASOK within two and a half months “has dragged the NW into too many things, so we are a productive, serious, credible and effective opposition. Responding to ‘Akis Skertsos who had earlier quoted an interview on the same frequency, Androulis commented that “I heard him say that PASOK’s proposals are taking the country out of the European acquis”. In this context he asked whether the abolition of the golden visa he proposes brought Portugal out of Europe, whether the extraordinary taxation on banks in Spain took it out of Europe, whether the use of the Recovery Fund for Health brought Italy out of Europe. She also accused the government that even her amendment on private health insurance will apply in 2026 and that any reduction now made by the companies themselves due to the emergence of the issue by PASOK. “Oligopolys and accuracy are not random, it is an option and it is a choice of complications,” he said.
Androuliakis: “A stand-alone march towards the NW – No far-right nor dracists in my own cabinet”
—
in Policy